Well, that was a while, wasn't it? I haven't posted anything since early December. No reason for it, the muse simply failed to strike. Okay, the muse is back, inspired by the Dem's loss in the Massachusetts special election.
Before I get to my comments, first, let's set the stage. Ol' Swimmer Ted, finally receiving a little of the karmic redress he's so dearly deserved, for so many years, contracts brain cancer. I read somewhere, and I hope it's true, that the type he had was particularly painful. It cannot undo anything the murderous, treasonous swine did in his long and infamous senate career, but it puts a little into the payback column. I just wish I could believe, as Emperor Misha does, that there is a Hell, a place of fire and brimstone, where the Drunken Lifeguard will spend eternity roasting on a spit...where the spit is "Satan's barbed cock," and the lecherous loser is rotating on it about his rectal passage. Unfortunately, I can take no solace in that. Ahh, well, as I say, at least he died in pain.
In addition, he died leaving one of his great Life's Projects incomplete. There they were, poised to pass the health care waiting list act, and Buick's worst spokesman up and dies. Now they have to fill his seat. Fortunately, Massachusetts law requires that (a) an empty federal senate seat be filled by Gubernatorial appointment, and (b) Mass has a Democrat governor.
Oh, wait, no, (a) is no longer the case. In 2004, when it looked like Johnny Treason was going to unseat Bumbletongue Bush for the presidency, the Mass legislature changed the rules. See, they had a RINO governor at the time, and a thin senate majority. If Romney had the power to appoint the new senator, he might appoint a Republican, thinning (or erasing, I forget) the Dem majority. Guess who urged the legislature to make the change. That's right, Treason Ted himself.
Fast forward; Chappaquiddick Ted is dying, and the Dems have a 60 seat supermajority. So old "I never drink my scotch straight up, I always mix it...with vodka" suggests the state house change the rule back. The optics of this are terrible, and hell, it's Mass, which hasn't elected a Repub to national office since the Medieval Warming Period, so, no change, and they have a special election.
The candidate for the Dems, Martha Coakley, is a disaster. And should probably be in prison for prosecutorial misconduct. But, she has a "D" after her name, and she does have statewide recognition, having been elected to statewide office. The Repub's candidate, Scott Brown hasn't these advantages. He does however, come with his own advantages, namely, Martha Coakley and pResident Uh-bama.
Long story short, for the first time since dinosaurs walked the earth, Massachusetts elected a Repub. Result, the Dem supermajority is gone, and Kennedy's pet project is in serious shit, in fact, probably toast.
My reaction...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Whew, let me catch my breath here...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Oh, lord, the irony is so creamy and rich I, in Ace's formulation, want to whip out my balls and dip them in it.
A few years back, during a spat between the Dicksuck Chicks and Toby Keith, there appeared a tee shirt for Dipsy Slut fans, the not too subtle FUTK.
I'm thinking we resurrect those letters. And rejoice that, hopefully, evil two tiered American health care continues to exist, so that cutting edge medicine continues to advance, and there is a pressure outlet for all the crappy socialized medical systems. And, what the hell, it will make Canadians happy, since they'll still have the existence of our piss poor socialized medical system to help them fell superior to Americans.
FUTK
Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
McHitler, You Really Are an Asshole
Have I already used that title for a post? I don't think so, I haven't called the seedy little shit we have for a premier Hitler yet. I think. Oh, well, I'm not a real believer in Godwin's law anyway, so fuck it. You don't like me likening him to a fascist, maybe he shouldn't act like one. Fuck off out of the country and have his henchmen ram one of the greatest tax hikes in provincial history through by procedural manouvre? And then have the sheer unmitigated fucking gall to tell us how good it's going to be for us? Fuck off Dalton. May I call you Dalton? I know in polite company you don't call a man by his first name unless he asks you to, but, well, I'm not feeling very polite, so fuck it, and fuck you, Dalton.
Anyway, the corrupt little fuck is off pissing our tax dollars away on a junket to India. I guess protocol required he take his fingers out of his ears and stop screaming, "La la la la, I can't hear you objecting to the HST, la la la la" At least long enough to say, "Fuck off taxpayers, I'll do what I want, I'm a Liberal with a majority government." I quote from memory.
Seriously, though, the incompetent, functional retard said basically that, although he phrased it more along the lines of, "We're going to bring in the HST because a modern Ontario needs a modern tax system, and this will help make us competitive going forward." Umm, dickhead, how, exactly? And feel free to use one syllable words, since, well, that's all your stunted intellect can handle, anyway.
If we're lucky, we're just easing out of a really bad recession. Raising taxes is one REALLY good way to take a fragile recovery and guarantee that it's merely the upswing of a double dip recession. Jeebus, this jackass has the "How to turn a cyclic recession into a major depression" handbook, and he's running it step by step.
Idiotic spending and borrowing levels. Check.
Major new spending initiatives. Check.
Disappear money down the corruptocrat rat hole. Check.
Raise taxes. Check.
Great, zippy, just fucking great. Mrs. Fulminandrew and I are doing okay. Not great, but okay; we're making it through, but this extra thousand bucks you're going to hoover out of our pockets is going to hurt. I can't imagine what it's going to do to the poor bastards on EI, fixed income, pensions, or scraping by paycheck to paycheck.
They say you get the government you deserve. That's bullshit. The stupid fuckers who voted Liberal and NDP get the government they deserve. What the fuck did I, and all the other actually productive residents of Ontario, do to deserve the Dalton McGuinty BOHICA treatment? They got the govt they deserve, but they're taking my anus along for the ride, and I really, really don't fucking appreciate it.
Assholes.
Anyway, the corrupt little fuck is off pissing our tax dollars away on a junket to India. I guess protocol required he take his fingers out of his ears and stop screaming, "La la la la, I can't hear you objecting to the HST, la la la la" At least long enough to say, "Fuck off taxpayers, I'll do what I want, I'm a Liberal with a majority government." I quote from memory.
Seriously, though, the incompetent, functional retard said basically that, although he phrased it more along the lines of, "We're going to bring in the HST because a modern Ontario needs a modern tax system, and this will help make us competitive going forward." Umm, dickhead, how, exactly? And feel free to use one syllable words, since, well, that's all your stunted intellect can handle, anyway.
If we're lucky, we're just easing out of a really bad recession. Raising taxes is one REALLY good way to take a fragile recovery and guarantee that it's merely the upswing of a double dip recession. Jeebus, this jackass has the "How to turn a cyclic recession into a major depression" handbook, and he's running it step by step.
Idiotic spending and borrowing levels. Check.
Major new spending initiatives. Check.
Disappear money down the corruptocrat rat hole. Check.
Raise taxes. Check.
Great, zippy, just fucking great. Mrs. Fulminandrew and I are doing okay. Not great, but okay; we're making it through, but this extra thousand bucks you're going to hoover out of our pockets is going to hurt. I can't imagine what it's going to do to the poor bastards on EI, fixed income, pensions, or scraping by paycheck to paycheck.
They say you get the government you deserve. That's bullshit. The stupid fuckers who voted Liberal and NDP get the government they deserve. What the fuck did I, and all the other actually productive residents of Ontario, do to deserve the Dalton McGuinty BOHICA treatment? They got the govt they deserve, but they're taking my anus along for the ride, and I really, really don't fucking appreciate it.
Assholes.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Ignatieff, What a Putz
Now, I don't, generally, disagree too vehemently with Jay Currie. Hell, I wouldn't have put him in my blogroll if I thought he were an idiot, but I gotta take issue here.
Once upon a time Currie was, rightly, castigating the Harper "Conservatives" for their Liberal ways and opined that, since the "conservatives" were behaving like Liberals, if he had to take stuffy, pompous Harper, or his Liberal counterparts, he'd take the Ignatieff Liberals. At least, he reasoned, Ignatieff had style.
Yes, Mr. Currie, it turns out that Ignatieff does have style. I mean, gawky, pompous, whiny, deer-in-the-headlights, political naif is a style. I'm just thinking that it's really not what you meant when you suggested that he has style.
What prompted this little rant? This week's second reading of the bill to repeal the gun registry. Saw Mr. Ignatieff on the news whining about the evil conservatives politicizing the gun registry.
Guess what, moron, it was your incompetent, corrupt Cretinite predecessors who wrote the law in the first place. That would be the act that brought it into the political sphere, dare I say, politicizing it.
Get this through your thick, tourist head Mr. Ignatieff, between 1 and 2 BILLION dollars have been wasted getting farmers to register their gopher guns. Also, see if you can drive this through your thick skull, criminals break the law, it's the unique property that makes them criminals (use a pound sledge hammer if you think it will help). I'm thinking that maybe, just maybe, the street gangs and biker gangs who account for most of the gun crime (pre - you didn't register your squirrel rifle, off to jail with you farmer brown) aren't going to register their guns.
Oh, and, btw, the guns most frequently used in crime, handguns, already required registration. So, please, either (a) get a clue or (b) get off your whiny, pompous, faux outrage high horse. This country has serious problems, and we need a serious oppostition leader. And if you can't handle the job, Power Corps will give it to Bob Rae, and we REALLY don't need a Canada level rerun of the disaster that was his premiership.
Once upon a time Currie was, rightly, castigating the Harper "Conservatives" for their Liberal ways and opined that, since the "conservatives" were behaving like Liberals, if he had to take stuffy, pompous Harper, or his Liberal counterparts, he'd take the Ignatieff Liberals. At least, he reasoned, Ignatieff had style.
Yes, Mr. Currie, it turns out that Ignatieff does have style. I mean, gawky, pompous, whiny, deer-in-the-headlights, political naif is a style. I'm just thinking that it's really not what you meant when you suggested that he has style.
What prompted this little rant? This week's second reading of the bill to repeal the gun registry. Saw Mr. Ignatieff on the news whining about the evil conservatives politicizing the gun registry.
Guess what, moron, it was your incompetent, corrupt Cretinite predecessors who wrote the law in the first place. That would be the act that brought it into the political sphere, dare I say, politicizing it.
Get this through your thick, tourist head Mr. Ignatieff, between 1 and 2 BILLION dollars have been wasted getting farmers to register their gopher guns. Also, see if you can drive this through your thick skull, criminals break the law, it's the unique property that makes them criminals (use a pound sledge hammer if you think it will help). I'm thinking that maybe, just maybe, the street gangs and biker gangs who account for most of the gun crime (pre - you didn't register your squirrel rifle, off to jail with you farmer brown) aren't going to register their guns.
Oh, and, btw, the guns most frequently used in crime, handguns, already required registration. So, please, either (a) get a clue or (b) get off your whiny, pompous, faux outrage high horse. This country has serious problems, and we need a serious oppostition leader. And if you can't handle the job, Power Corps will give it to Bob Rae, and we REALLY don't need a Canada level rerun of the disaster that was his premiership.
Monday, November 2, 2009
Heavy Metal Monday, McGuinty is a Pinhead Edition
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, calling this the "McGuinty is a Pinhead Edition" of Heavy Metal Monday really doesn't narrow down the possible topics a whole helluva lot, does it?
Let's narrow it down. The two greatest spending priorities of the provincial governments are (1) health care and (2) education. In Ontario they eat up about 3/4 of the provincial budget (1/2 for health and 1/4 for education), and the functional retard we have "running" the show in Queen's Park is fucking up both of them at this very minute.
How? I'd say. "Let me count the ways," but I have two specific examples in mind. Universal, all day babysitting for 4 and 5 year olds. Oops, I mean kindergarten. And the hatchet job the fucker is doing on the folks in Cambridge.
I gave props to Premier Ferret Face for figuring out that all boys education is an idea whose time has come. Now it's back to the brickbat.
Universal, all day kindergarten for 4 and 5 year olds, Dalton? To the (official) tune of 1.5 billion dollars per year. When, you cock smoking prick, your govt is running a 25 billion dollar deficit?
Some questions, you weasel faced street pizza: Do you really think I'm stupid enough to believe any govt's spending projections, much less a socialist piece of crap govt? Or do you just figure you need the anencephalic vote?
Do you really believe there is any educational and economic benefit to it? Or are you disturbed that you didn't get re-elected with 99% of the vote, so you need to start the statist indoctrination at 4. Hell, numbnuts, some dipshit in Washington DC wants to start kindergarten at 3. Get 'em before they're out of diapers, maybe then you can program all independant thought out of their heads.
Why are you such a lying crapweasel? This has nothing, specifically, to do with the topic to hand, I just want to know.
Considering you're about to pile probably 3 billion a year onto a budget already 25 billion in the red, just where is the money going to come from? You think that HST tax hike is going to increase revenue? Really? No increased underground economy, no driving business under or out of province? You're really gonna get all that lovely money, are you? Shithead.
I know, you can get the money by cutting health care. You can start by screwing over those impertinent bastards in Cambridge, who absolutely refuse to be good little germans and elect a Liberal.
For my reader, if you don't get the reference, I heard on the news today that the toad the province has parachuted in to shut down the Cambridge hospital...oops, I mean, balance the hospital budget, is planning on cutting 5 million from the budget. Brilliant plan. The fucking hospital is 28% underfunded. Let's see if we can't get that underfunding above the magical 1/3. Maybe then there'll be an outbreak of e difficile, or flesh eating bacteria, or the bubonic plague, and a bunch of people will die, and you can finally close the place down. That'll teach the stupid, PC voting peasants not to pay proper homage to His Royal Scungiliciousness, Dalton fucking McGuinty.
Sayyyyy, actual, real cuts to health care. The ones I showed in my last post to never have occurred in the Mike Harris years. Brought to you by the party of "protecting health care and Canadian Values," the lying, scum sucking, Liberal Piece of Shit party.
I truly hope you die a lingering and painful death, you vomitous cretin.
What in the hell am I going to choose for a song to go with this? These two latest ilLiberal moves are nuts, but I did Crazy Train last week.
Lets go back to good ol' rock and roll, heavy metal ancestors AC DC to describe where McShithead is taking us.
And for real heavy metal...gonna go to Opeth, and Ghost of Perdition, also in honour of where the spineless crapweasel is taking us. God DAMN, I hate that prick.
Let's narrow it down. The two greatest spending priorities of the provincial governments are (1) health care and (2) education. In Ontario they eat up about 3/4 of the provincial budget (1/2 for health and 1/4 for education), and the functional retard we have "running" the show in Queen's Park is fucking up both of them at this very minute.
How? I'd say. "Let me count the ways," but I have two specific examples in mind. Universal, all day babysitting for 4 and 5 year olds. Oops, I mean kindergarten. And the hatchet job the fucker is doing on the folks in Cambridge.
I gave props to Premier Ferret Face for figuring out that all boys education is an idea whose time has come. Now it's back to the brickbat.
Universal, all day kindergarten for 4 and 5 year olds, Dalton? To the (official) tune of 1.5 billion dollars per year. When, you cock smoking prick, your govt is running a 25 billion dollar deficit?
Some questions, you weasel faced street pizza: Do you really think I'm stupid enough to believe any govt's spending projections, much less a socialist piece of crap govt? Or do you just figure you need the anencephalic vote?
Do you really believe there is any educational and economic benefit to it? Or are you disturbed that you didn't get re-elected with 99% of the vote, so you need to start the statist indoctrination at 4. Hell, numbnuts, some dipshit in Washington DC wants to start kindergarten at 3. Get 'em before they're out of diapers, maybe then you can program all independant thought out of their heads.
Why are you such a lying crapweasel? This has nothing, specifically, to do with the topic to hand, I just want to know.
Considering you're about to pile probably 3 billion a year onto a budget already 25 billion in the red, just where is the money going to come from? You think that HST tax hike is going to increase revenue? Really? No increased underground economy, no driving business under or out of province? You're really gonna get all that lovely money, are you? Shithead.
I know, you can get the money by cutting health care. You can start by screwing over those impertinent bastards in Cambridge, who absolutely refuse to be good little germans and elect a Liberal.
For my reader, if you don't get the reference, I heard on the news today that the toad the province has parachuted in to shut down the Cambridge hospital...oops, I mean, balance the hospital budget, is planning on cutting 5 million from the budget. Brilliant plan. The fucking hospital is 28% underfunded. Let's see if we can't get that underfunding above the magical 1/3. Maybe then there'll be an outbreak of e difficile, or flesh eating bacteria, or the bubonic plague, and a bunch of people will die, and you can finally close the place down. That'll teach the stupid, PC voting peasants not to pay proper homage to His Royal Scungiliciousness, Dalton fucking McGuinty.
Sayyyyy, actual, real cuts to health care. The ones I showed in my last post to never have occurred in the Mike Harris years. Brought to you by the party of "protecting health care and Canadian Values," the lying, scum sucking, Liberal Piece of Shit party.
I truly hope you die a lingering and painful death, you vomitous cretin.
What in the hell am I going to choose for a song to go with this? These two latest ilLiberal moves are nuts, but I did Crazy Train last week.
Lets go back to good ol' rock and roll, heavy metal ancestors AC DC to describe where McShithead is taking us.
And for real heavy metal...gonna go to Opeth, and Ghost of Perdition, also in honour of where the spineless crapweasel is taking us. God DAMN, I hate that prick.
Monday, September 14, 2009
A Heavy Metal Monday Smattering of Shit
Heard on the morning news roundup. Kanye West, you're an asshole.
So, the smiliest used car salesman in Canadian politics, while claiming to be ready for an election, also says he will support the Conservatives, for the first time, if the bill to extend EI benefits "really helps workers." Bullshit. If the polling data look bad, he supports the bill, if the data look good, we go to an election. Jack O'Layton, you're an asshole.
The gawkiest American professor in Canadian politics says, "Canadians can do better," so he's going to trigger an election at the first opportunity. Nazzo fast, Guido, say other Liberals. Hmm, no one wants an election but Ignatieff, and he thinks we can do better. Is better defined as "pissing 300 million away on an election to end up with pretty much the same parliament, in order to salve Michael Ignatieff's ego?" If not, I'm thinking that, yes, Ignatieff, you're an asshole.
The fattest commie on the planet (and that's for damn sure saying something) prepares to release his latest homage to Leni Reifenstahl. This one is about the evils of capitalism. Wow, the planetoid known as Michael Moore is worth north of 50 million bucks, earned in the capitalist system, and is set to hoover a few more millions out of it with the help of the stupid and gullible, by complaining about the very system which enriched him. Michael Moore-on (no link here to that piece of shit), you're an asshole.
BTW, if you want an entertaining read, chronicling just how massive a hypocrite Micky Moron is (and not in the 48-waist-pants sense of the word), try "Do as I Say (Not as I Do)" by Peter Schweitzer.
Well, it's Heavy Metal Monday, and I'm thinking that all the assholes above need to be doing either The Thorazine Shuffle, or taking massive doses of...
Is Evanescence Heavy Metal? Well, Goth Metal, at any rate. Does that count for Heavy Metal Monday? Maybe, but since, as mentioned on a previous Heavy Metal Monday, the ballads aren't my thing, let us cleanse the palate. And ask all of the above assholes to kindly...
So, the smiliest used car salesman in Canadian politics, while claiming to be ready for an election, also says he will support the Conservatives, for the first time, if the bill to extend EI benefits "really helps workers." Bullshit. If the polling data look bad, he supports the bill, if the data look good, we go to an election. Jack O'Layton, you're an asshole.
The gawkiest American professor in Canadian politics says, "Canadians can do better," so he's going to trigger an election at the first opportunity. Nazzo fast, Guido, say other Liberals. Hmm, no one wants an election but Ignatieff, and he thinks we can do better. Is better defined as "pissing 300 million away on an election to end up with pretty much the same parliament, in order to salve Michael Ignatieff's ego?" If not, I'm thinking that, yes, Ignatieff, you're an asshole.
The fattest commie on the planet (and that's for damn sure saying something) prepares to release his latest homage to Leni Reifenstahl. This one is about the evils of capitalism. Wow, the planetoid known as Michael Moore is worth north of 50 million bucks, earned in the capitalist system, and is set to hoover a few more millions out of it with the help of the stupid and gullible, by complaining about the very system which enriched him. Michael Moore-on (no link here to that piece of shit), you're an asshole.
BTW, if you want an entertaining read, chronicling just how massive a hypocrite Micky Moron is (and not in the 48-waist-pants sense of the word), try "Do as I Say (Not as I Do)" by Peter Schweitzer.
Well, it's Heavy Metal Monday, and I'm thinking that all the assholes above need to be doing either The Thorazine Shuffle, or taking massive doses of...
Is Evanescence Heavy Metal? Well, Goth Metal, at any rate. Does that count for Heavy Metal Monday? Maybe, but since, as mentioned on a previous Heavy Metal Monday, the ballads aren't my thing, let us cleanse the palate. And ask all of the above assholes to kindly...
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Carrie Prejean "Nude" Photos
Okay. I wasn't going to go anywhere near the latest in the Carrie Prejean saga because, well, I didn't care enough to bother. Then the "topless" photo "scandal" broke. Now it's out there, and I feel the need to vent.
First, if she's topless, but her back is turned, and her arm covers all but about 10% of her breast, does it really count as topless? I have a pretty simple definition of topless; if I can't see nipple, it don't count.
Second, since the woman is a beauty pageant alumnus, seriously, how much more exposed can she be now, than she already was? Seriously, is this, racier than this?
Third, why is it that behaviour the left actively encourages, is scandalous when engaged in by a member of the right? Right here in my "beloved" homeland, some lefty bint ran around Guelph topless, for a week, trying to get arrested, in order to test the constitutionality of the law which made women's toplessness indecent. Eventually she was, she did, and the law was struck down, and the left celebrated this as a victory for "women't rights." Now they're upset about 10% of Carrie Prejean's right breast? Riiiiight.
I know, it's about the hypocrisy. Again, riiiiight. Ted "the Lifeguard" Kennedy, champion of women's rights, kills Mary Jo Kopechne, no hypocrisy there, just 300 more years in the Senate, but let a beauty queen expose 10% of her right breast? Burn the witch.
Fourth, although she didn't win the pageant, she is now one of the most famous women in America. Let's see, beautiful? Check. Famous? Check. Rich? Not yet, but if you don't think she will be shortly, I'd better get a tip jar installed so you can deposit the down payment on a bridge I've got for sale.
Crapola. And it's all I'm going to say about it. It does, however, give rise to other issues, namely, standards of beauty, "gay marriage" and the ongoing rape of language by people who can't win an argument on its merits. But those will be covered in follow up posts.
First, if she's topless, but her back is turned, and her arm covers all but about 10% of her breast, does it really count as topless? I have a pretty simple definition of topless; if I can't see nipple, it don't count.
Second, since the woman is a beauty pageant alumnus, seriously, how much more exposed can she be now, than she already was? Seriously, is this, racier than this?
Third, why is it that behaviour the left actively encourages, is scandalous when engaged in by a member of the right? Right here in my "beloved" homeland, some lefty bint ran around Guelph topless, for a week, trying to get arrested, in order to test the constitutionality of the law which made women's toplessness indecent. Eventually she was, she did, and the law was struck down, and the left celebrated this as a victory for "women't rights." Now they're upset about 10% of Carrie Prejean's right breast? Riiiiight.
I know, it's about the hypocrisy. Again, riiiiight. Ted "the Lifeguard" Kennedy, champion of women's rights, kills Mary Jo Kopechne, no hypocrisy there, just 300 more years in the Senate, but let a beauty queen expose 10% of her right breast? Burn the witch.
Fourth, although she didn't win the pageant, she is now one of the most famous women in America. Let's see, beautiful? Check. Famous? Check. Rich? Not yet, but if you don't think she will be shortly, I'd better get a tip jar installed so you can deposit the down payment on a bridge I've got for sale.
Crapola. And it's all I'm going to say about it. It does, however, give rise to other issues, namely, standards of beauty, "gay marriage" and the ongoing rape of language by people who can't win an argument on its merits. But those will be covered in follow up posts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
